Article Details
Scrape Timestamp (UTC): 2026-02-09 14:06:33.274
Source: https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/09/taiwan_us_chip_production/
Original Article Text
Click to Toggle View
Taiwan tells Uncle Sam its chip ecosystem ain't going anywhere. Moving 40% of semiconductor production to America is 'impossible' says vice premier. Taiwan's vice-premier has ruled out relocating 40 percent of the country's semiconductor production to the US, calling the Trump administration's goal "impossible." In an interview broadcast on the CTS channel, vice premier Cheng Li-chiun said she made clear to US officials that Taiwan's semiconductor ecosystem cannot be moved and its most advanced technologies will remain domestic. "When it comes to 40 or 50 percent of production capacity being moved to the United States... I have made it very clear to the US side that this is impossible," she said, according to The Straits Times. Cheng led Taiwan's January's trade delegation to Washington, which secured reduced US tariffs on Taiwanese goods - from 20 percent to 15 percent - in exchange for increased investment into America's tech sector. At the time, US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC the deal aimed to relocate 40 percent of Taiwan's entire chip manufacturing and production capacity to America. A Department of Commerce release cast the agreement as a "massive reshoring of America's semiconductor sector." Taiwan, which produces more than 60 percent of global semiconductors and roughly 90 percent of the world's most advanced chips, insists it gained this leadership position by investing in the tech when other countries didn't. Former Intel chief Pat Gelsinger supports this view, publicly stating a couple of years ago that countries like Korea, Taiwan, and China put in place long-term industrial policies and investment in chipmaking, while the US and European nations failed to do the same. Cheng reiterated this in her interview, saying that "an industrial ecosystem built up over decades cannot be relocated." Taiwan views its semiconductor dominance as strategic defense against Chinese aggression. Beijing claims Taiwan as its territory and threatens reunification by force if necessary. Even Lutnick acknowledged this "silicon shield" dynamic last year, noting China's open ambitions: "We need their silicon, the chips so badly that we'll shield them, we'll protect them." TSMC considered relocating its chip fabs in 2024 due to China threats but decided against the idea given the difficulties. Any Chinese invasion would devastate the global tech sector, as The Register pointed out recently. Most of Nvidia's GPUs are made in Taiwan, as are AMD's processors and Qualcomm's smartphone chips. The supply of these would be cut off by any invasion, and there is no other source these companies can easily turn to.
Daily Brief Summary
Taiwan's vice-premier, Cheng Li-chiun, declared that relocating 40% of Taiwan's semiconductor production to the US is unfeasible, maintaining the country's advanced chip technologies domestically.
This statement follows a trade agreement where Taiwan secured reduced US tariffs in exchange for increased investment in the American tech sector, amid US ambitions to bolster its semiconductor industry.
Taiwan produces over 60% of global semiconductors and nearly 90% of the world's most advanced chips, a strategic position viewed as a defense against potential Chinese aggression.
The US Department of Commerce described the trade deal as a significant reshoring effort, though Taiwan insists its semiconductor ecosystem, developed over decades, cannot be moved.
TSMC, a major player in Taiwan's chip industry, considered relocating due to Chinese threats but recognized the logistical challenges, reinforcing Taiwan's stance on keeping production local.
The potential impact of any Chinese invasion on the global tech sector is significant, with companies like Nvidia, AMD, and Qualcomm heavily reliant on Taiwan for their chip supply.
Taiwan's strategy and investments in semiconductor technology have been pivotal in maintaining its leadership, contrasting with the US and Europe's historical lack of similar long-term industrial policies.